RPM spec files have several sections which allow packages to run code on installation and removal. These bits of code are called scriptlets and are mostly used to update the running system with information from the package. This page offers a quick overview of RPM scriptlets and a number of common recipes for scriptlets in packages. For a more complete treatment of scriptlets, please see the Maximum RPM book.
The version of RPM in Fedora also has functionality to automatically run scripts when files are placed in certain locations. (See 1.) This potentially obviates the need for most of the scriptlets on this page, but is not currently implemented in all cases where it could be.
In Fedora, all scriptlets can safely assume they are running under the bash shell unless a different language has been specified.
The basic syntax is similar to the %build, %install, and other sections of the rpm spec file. The scripts support a special flag, -p which allows the scriptlet to invoke a single program directly rather than having to spawn a shell to invoke the programs. (ie: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig)
When scriptlets are called, they will be supplied aith an argument. This argument, accessed via $1 (for shell scripts) is the number of packages of this name which will be left on the system when the action completes, except for %pretrans and %posttrans which are always run with $1 as 0.. So for the common case of install, upgrade, and uninstall we have:
install | upgrade | uninstall | |
%pretrans | $1 == 0 | $1 == 0 | (N/A) |
%pre | $1 == 1 | $1 == 2 | (N/A) |
%post | $1 == 1 | $1 == 2 | (N/A) |
%preun | (N/A) | $1 == 1 | $1 == 0 |
%postun | (N/A) | $1 == 1 | $1 == 0 |
%posttrans | $1 == 0 | $1 == 0 | (N/A) |
Note that these values will vary if there are multiple versions of the same package installed (This mostly occurs with parallel installable packages such as the kernel and multilib packages. However, it can also occur when errors prevent a package upgrade from completing.) So it is a good idea to use this construct:
%pre
if [ $1 -gt 1 ] ; then
fi
…for %pre and %post scripts rather than checking that it equals 2.
All scriptlets MUST exit with the zero exit status. Because RPM in its
default configuration does not execute shell scriptlets with the -e
argument to the shell, excluding explicit exit
calls (frowned upon
with a non-zero argument!), the exit status of the last command in a
scriptlet determines its exit status. Most commands in the snippets in
this document have a “|| :
” appended to them, which is a generic
trick to force the zero exit status for those commands whether they
worked or not. Usually the most important bit is to apply this to the
last command executed in a scriptlet, or to add a separate command such
as plain “:
” or “exit 0
” as the last one in a scriptlet. Note
that depending on the case, other error checking/prevention measures may
be more appropriate.
Non-zero exit codes from scriptlets can break installs/upgrades/erases such that no further actions will be taken for that package in a transaction (see #Scriptlet Ordering below), which may for example prevent an old version of a package from being erased on upgrades, leaving behind duplicate rpmdb entries and possibly stale, unowned files on the filesystem. There are some cases where letting the transaction to proceed when some things in scriptlets failed may result in partially broken setup. It is however often limited to that package only whereas letting a transaction to proceed with some packages dropped out on the fly is more likely to result in broader system wide problems.
The scriptlets in %pre and %post are respectively run before and after a package is installed. The scriptlets %preun and %postun are run before and after a package is uninstalled. The scriptlets %pretrans and %posttrans are run at start and end of a transaction. On upgrade, the scripts are run in the following order:
Note that the %pretrans
scriptlet will, in the particular case of
system installation, run before anything at all has been installed. This
implies that it cannot have any dependencies at all. For this reason,
%pretrans
is best avoided, but if used it MUST (by necessity) be
written in Lua. See http://rpm.org/user_doc/lua.html for more
information.
Some tips for writing good scriptlets
Sometimes a scriptlet needs to save some state from an earlier running scriptlet in order to use it at a later running scriptlet. This is especially common when trying to optimize the scriptlets. Examples:
%posttrans
needs to de-register some piece of information
when upgrading but the file that has that information is removed when
the old package is removed the scriptlets need to save that file
during %pre
or %post
so that the script in %posttrans
can
access it.%posttrans
to do its work once
per-transaction, we may need to write out a flag file so that the
%posttrans
knows whether to perform an action.To address these issues scriptlets that run earlier need to write out
information that is used in %posttrans
. We recommend using a
subdirectory of %{_localstatedir}/lib/rpm-state/
for that. For
instance, the eclipse plugin scripts touch a file in
%{_localstatedir}/lib/rpm-state/eclipse/
when they’re installed. The
%posttrans
runs a script that checks if that file exists. If it
does, it performs its action and then deletes the file. That way the
script only performs its action once per transaction.
If RPM file triggers are not appropriate, complex scriptlets which are shared between multiple packages MAY be placed in RPM macros. This has two benefits:
When writing the macros, the FPC will still want to review the macros (and perhaps include the implementation of the macros in the guideline to show packagers what’s happening behind the scenes).
One principle that the FPC follows is that macros generally don’t
contain the start of scriptlet tags (for instance, %pre
) because
this makes it difficult to do additional work in the scriptlet. This
also means that a single macro can not be defined to do things in both
%pre
and %post
. Instead, write one macro that performs the
actions in %pre
and a separate macro that performs the actions in
%post
. This principle makes it so that all spec files can use your
macros in the same manner even if they already have a %pre
or
%post
defined.
Of course, in the above situation it is better to use RPM file triggers if at all possible.
These are discussed on a separate page
GConf is a configuration scheme currently used by the GNOME desktop. Programs which use it setup default values in a [NAME] .schemas file which is installed under %{_sysconfdir}/gconf/schemas/[NAME] .schemas. These defaults are then registered with the gconf daemon which monitors the configuration values and alerts applications when values the applications are interested in change. The schema files also provide documentation about what each value in the configuration system means (which gets displayed when you browse the database in the gconf-editor program).
For packaging purposes, we have to disable schema installation during build, and also register the values in the [NAME] .schemas file with the gconf daemon on installation and unregister them on removal. Due to the ordering of the scriptlets, this is a four step process.
Disabling the GConf installation during the package creation can be done like so:
%install
export GCONF_DISABLE_MAKEFILE_SCHEMA_INSTALL=1
make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
...
The GCONF_DISABLE_MAKEFILE_SCHEMA_INSTALL environment variable suppresses the installation of the schema during the building of the package. An alternative for some packages is to pass a configure flag:
%build
%configure --disable-schemas
...
Unfortunately, this configure switch only works if the upstream packager has adapted their Makefile.am to handle it. If the Makefile.am is not configured, this switch won’t do anything and you’ll need to use the environment variable instead.
Here’s the second part:
BuildRequires: GConf2
Requires(pre): GConf2
Requires(post): GConf2
Requires(preun): GConf2
...
%pre
%gconf_schema_prepare schema1 schema2
%gconf_schema_obsolete schema3
In this section we uninstall old schemas during upgrade using one of two macros.
%gconf_schema_prepare
is used for any current GConf schemas. It
takes care of uninstalling previous versions of schemas that this
package currently installs. It takes a space separated list of schema
names without path or suffix that the package installs. Note that behind
the scenes, this macro works with the %post
scriptlet to only
process GConf schemas if changes have occurred.
%gconf_schema_obsolete
is used for schemas that this package
previously provided but no longer does. It will deregister the old
schema if it is present on the system. Nothing will happen if the old
schema is not present. This macro takes a space separated list of
schemas to uninstall. One example of using this might be if the package
changed names. If the old schema was named foo.schemas
and the new
schema is named foobar.schemas
you’d use:
%gconf_schema_prepare foobar
%gconf_schema_obsolete foo
The next section does the processing of the newly installed schemas:
%post
%gconf_schema_upgrade schema1 schema2
%gconf_schema_upgrade
takes a space separated list of schemas that
the package currently installs just like %gconf_schema_prepare
.
Behind the scenes, it does the actual work of registering the new
version of the schema and deregistering the old version.
The last section is for unregistering schemas when a package is removed:
%preun
%gconf_schema_remove schema1 schema2
When a package is upgraded rpm invokes the %pre
scriptlet to
register and deregister the schemas. When a package is uninstalled, the
%preun
scriptlet is used. %gconf_schema_remove
takes the list of
schemas that this package currently provides and removes them for us.
When macros change, packages that make use of them have to be rebuilt to pick up the changes. This repoquery command can be used to find the schema including packages to rebuild:
repoquery --whatprovides "/etc/gconf/schemas/*" |sort |uniq |wc -l
EPEL does not have macros.gconf2, so please follow the instructions found here: Packaging:EPEL#GConf
The GNU project and many other programs use the texinfo file format for much of its documentation. These info files are usually located in /usr/share/info/. When installing or removing a package, install-info from the info package takes care of adding the newly installed files to the main info index and removing them again on deinstallation.
Requires(post): info
Requires(preun): info
...
%post
/sbin/install-info %{_infodir}/%{name}.info %{_infodir}/dir || :
%preun
if [ $1 = 0 ] ; then
/sbin/install-info --delete %{_infodir}/%{name}.info %{_infodir}/dir || :
fi
These two scriptlets tell install-info to add entries for the info pages to the main index file on installation and remove them at erase time. The “|| :” in this case prevents failures that would typically affect systems that have been configured not to install any %doc files, or have read-only mounted, %_netsharedpath /usr/share.
If an application installs icons into one of the subdirectories in
%{_datadir}/icons/
(such as hicolor
in the following examples),
icon caches must be updated so that the installed icons show up in menus
right after package installation. This consists of updating the
timestamp of the top-level icon directory where the icons were
installed, and running gtk-update-icon-cache
. ‘touch’ing the
top-level dir is done so that environments compatible with the Icon
theme
specification
can refresh their caches, and gtk-update-icon-cache
which is
additionally required for GNOME also does its work based on the dir
timestamp.
Note that no dependencies should be added for this. If gtk-update-icon-cache is not available, there’s nothing that would be needing the cache update, ditto if “touch” is not available, there’s nothing that would benefit from icon cache updates installed yet either. Not adding the dependency on gtk-update-icon-cache (ie. gtk2 >= 2.6.0) or “touch” makes it easier to use the package (or the same specfile) on systems where it’s not available nor needed, such as older distro versions or (very) trimmed down installations, and generally results in less entries in specfiles, rpmdb, and repo metadatas.
%post
/bin/touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor &>/dev/null || :
%postun
if [ $1 -eq 0 ] ; then
/bin/touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor &>/dev/null
/usr/bin/gtk-update-icon-cache %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor &>/dev/null || :
fi
%posttrans
/usr/bin/gtk-update-icon-cache %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor &>/dev/null || :
Packages containing systemd unit files need to use scriptlets to ensure proper handling of those services. Services can either be enabled or disabled by default. To determine which case your specific service falls into, please refer to FESCo’s policy here: Packaging:DefaultServices. On upgrade, a package may only restart a service if it is running; it may not start it if it is off. Also, the service may not enable itself if it is currently disabled.
The systemd package provides a set of helper macros to handle systemd
scriptlet operations. These macros support systemd “presets”, as
documented in Features/PackagePresets. The
%systemd_requires
macro is a shortcut for listing the per-scriptlet
dependencies on systemd.
%{?systemd_requires}
BuildRequires: systemd
[...]
%post
%systemd_post apache-httpd.service
%preun
%systemd_preun apache-httpd.service
%postun
%systemd_postun_with_restart apache-httpd.service
Some services do not support being restarted (e.g. D-Bus and various
storage daemons). If your service should not be restarted upon upgrade,
then use the following %postun
scriptlet instead of the one shown
above:
%postun
%systemd_postun apache-httpd.service
If your package includes one or more systemd units that need to be enabled by default on package installation, they MUST be covered by the Fedora preset policy.
If a package is suitable for installation without systemd (in a
container image, for example) and does not require any of the systemd
mechanisms such as tmpfiles.d, then the %systemd_ordering
macro MAY
be used instead of the %systemd_requires
macro.
There are additional macros for user units (those installed under
%_userunitdir
) that should be used similarly to those for system
units. These enable and disable user units according to presets, and are
%systemd_user_post
(to be used in %post
) and
%systemd_user_preun
(to be used in %preun
).
%{?systemd_requires}
BuildRequires: systemd
[...]
%post
%systemd_user_post %{name}.service
%preun
%systemd_user_preun %{name}.service
/etc/shells
is a text file which controls whether an application can
be used as a system login shell of users. It contains the set of valid
shells which can be used in the system. If you are packaging a new
shell, you need to add entries to this file that reference the added
shells. See: man 5 SHELLS
for more information.
As this file can be edited by sysadmins, we need to first determine if
relevant lines are already in the file. If they don’t already exist then
we just need to echo the shell’s binary path to the file. Since the
UsrMove Feature in Fedora 17 made /bin
a symlink to /usr/bin
we
need to place both paths into the /etc/shells
file. Here is an
example of the scriptlet to package with shell named “foo”:
%post
if [ "$1" = 1 ]; then
if [ ! -f %{_sysconfdir}/shells ] ; then
echo "%{_bindir}/foo" > %{_sysconfdir}/shells
echo "/bin/foo" >> %{_sysconfdir}/shells
else
grep -q "^%{_bindir}/foo$" %{_sysconfdir}/shells || echo "%{_bindir}/foo" >> %{_sysconfdir}/shells
grep -q "^/bin/foo$" %{_sysconfdir}/shells || echo "/bin/foo" >> %{_sysconfdir}/shells
fi
%postun
if [ "$1" = 0 ] && [ -f %{_sysconfdir}/shells ] ; then
sed -i '\!^%{_bindir}/foo$!d' %{_sysconfdir}/shells
sed -i '\!^/bin/foo$!d' %{_sysconfdir}/shells
fi